Teams

SD 3.5 Mountain View/ Angione

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-27vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#2 DoublesFrances Simpson Lang / Cynthia Hensersky vs Ana Mariela Gamiz / Kristan Hanson2-6, 4-6
2022-10-20vs SD LLW 3.5 Mountain View/ WunderlyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarcela Dongo / Cynthia Hensersky vs Junko Toda / Haruko Vajda2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAida Padilla / Emma Sanchez vs Julie Wunderly / Mina Tsuya0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesCelia Hernandez / Cynthia Hensersky vs Janey Michaelsen / Sarah Suiter0-6, 1-6
2022-10-06vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathie Angione / Cynthia Hensersky vs Gretchen Shaffer / Lisa Shirley4-6, 1-6
2022-09-29vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ NicholsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Hensersky / Mer Chiodo vs Samantha Nelson / Liza Tacher6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-09-22vs SD 3.5 Mountain View/ LouisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Cortez / Cynthia Hensersky vs Brandy Baray / Roanne Manzano-Roth0-6, 2-6
2022-09-15vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ SchmiedLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Hensersky / Cheryl Roche vs Caroline Mickel / Christy Ward4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Celia Hernandez
published 3.5
3.24
Mer Chiodo
published
3.23
Cynthia Hensersky
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.15
Cheryl Roche
published 3.5
3.11
Emma Sanchez
published 3.5
2.96
2.88
Angela Cortez
published 3
2.81
2.56
Aida Padilla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kathie Angione
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Celia Hernandez
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mer Chiodo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cynthia Hensersky
43W–46L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cheryl Roche
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Emma Sanchez
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Frances Simpson Lang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Angela Cortez
15W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Ana Gelastopoulos
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Aida Padilla
54W–135L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Kathie Angione
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.