Teams

GreyHawk - LaFontaine

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-22vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Kranites / Gail Oroho vs Amy Schiffer / Katherine MacWilliams4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-08vs Fiddlers Creek - BoneventoWon 10
W#3 DoublesCyndee Verhelle / Lesley Kranites vs Laura Fischer / Laura Krueger2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-28vs Marco YMCA - BurschWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Barrett / Maureen Dougherty vs Renee Facciola / Ricki Giersch6-2, 6-3
2024-04-18vs COLLIER/Beaudet/40&Over3.5 WLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Martineson / Joan Barrett vs Natalie Cortese / Mary Varilek4-6, 2-6
2024-04-10vs Ritz Tiburon - J. BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesLesley Kranites / Paulina Maynetto vs Jennifer Brown / Brooke Sykes0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Elena Marina
published 4
3.36
Sara Martineson
published
3.30
Joan Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Maureen Dougherty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Gail Oroho
published 3.5
3.18
Laraine Segar
published
3.18
Maria Lafontaine
published
3.15
Sonja Pound
published
3.14
Sharon Herbst
published
2.90
Lesley Kranites
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Michelle Foland
published
Rosemary Cronin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lafontaine + Sharon Herbst3251% games+8.1% vs expected
Joan Barrett + Maureen Dougherty123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elena Marina
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
Sara Martineson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Joan Barrett
159W–116L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Maureen Dougherty
30W–48L career · 1 line in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gail Oroho
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Laraine Segar
22W–29L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Maria Lafontaine
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Sonja Pound
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sharon Herbst
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lesley Kranites
56W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.90
Michelle Foland
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Rosemary Cronin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.