Teams

IA/Buck-Bruntz/55&Over8.0MXD

2024 IA 55 & Over Adult Mixed League · 8.0X 55 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-08vs ShippWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Hansen / Matthew Whipps vs Dennis Lonzarich / Leslie Shipp7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Bruntz / Arthur Khaw vs Dawn Ver Steeg / Joel Sissel6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynette Brown / Mark Davidson vs Ronald Bradfield / Julie Kinsella4-6, 0-6
2024-09-08vs ShippWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Bruntz / Keith Buck vs Dennis Lonzarich / Leslie Shipp0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAngela Beaver / Stu Card vs Joel Sissel / Dawn Ver Steeg6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Hansen / Martin Fisher Jr vs Ronald Bradfield / Julie Kinsella6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-08-11vs ShippWon 21
W#1 DoublesStu Card / Angela Beaver vs Dennis Mailes / Carol Mailes6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMartin Fisher Jr / Mary Krause vs Richard Heil / Leslie Shipp6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Holly Shortenhaus vs Joel Sissel / Dawn Ver Steeg2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0X 55 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Buck-Bruntz/55&Over8.0MXD3063770
2Shipp03361282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Angela Beaver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Arthur Khaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Lynette Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Stu Card
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Mary Krause
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Martin Fisher Jr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Matthew Whipps
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Julie Bruntz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Mark Davidson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Holly Shortenhaus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Hansen
published
Keith Buck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Shortenhaus + Matthew Whipps134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Beaver
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.96
4
Arthur Khaw
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lynette Brown
43W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Stu Card
60W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Mary Krause
46W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Martin Fisher Jr
47W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Matthew Whipps
64W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Julie Bruntz
38W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.40
Mark Davidson
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Holly Shortenhaus
36W–71L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kathleen Hansen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Keith Buck
25W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.