Teams

Cochran 18s 7.5M Combo Tues PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Men Tues PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Lara 18s 7.5M Combo Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Nocera / Anthony Jackson vs Charles Chuang / Rodrigo Lara4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Steed / Edwin Petitfils vs Ajay Goyal / Alexis Beuchat3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMatthew Dunning / Jordan Cohen vs Daniel Thomas / Andres Llausas2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesBrad MacDonald / Brandon Weymann vs Todd Palmer / Kevin Grubb6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEric Nocera / Anthony Jackson vs Michael McGovern / Andrew Elsdon6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Dunning / Samraat Saxena vs Brian Boylston / Danny van Fleet6-3, 6-0
2026-08-11vs Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Cochran / Samraat Saxena vs Michael Raley / Mark Williams4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Cohen / Doug Jones vs Tony Lancaster / Ken Questell5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Men Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Brad MacDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Eric Nocera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Brandon Weymann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Matthew Dunning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Edwin Petitfils
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Matthew Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Doug Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Vince Credle
published
3.11
Jordan Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samraat Saxena
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad MacDonald + Brandon Weymann4356% games−0.7% vs expected
Jordan Cohen + Matthew Dunning033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad MacDonald
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Eric Nocera
17W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Brandon Weymann
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Matthew Dunning
33W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Edwin Petitfils
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Matthew Cochran
13W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Doug Jones
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Vince Credle
35W–24L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jordan Cohen
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Samraat Saxena
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.