Teams

UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 55MX8.0A

2024 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX8.0

26 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Karen Cannon
published
4.04
Jason Matlof
published
3.96
Joe Liebeschuetz
published 4
3.90
Mike Jawetz
published
3.86
Mahi DeSilva
published
3.80
Keith Koegler
published
3.78
Lisa Backus
published
3.68
Michael Kieschnick
published
3.67
David Cao
published 4
3.67
Stacy Reitmeir
published
3.66
Catharine Garber
published 4
3.65
Craig Jorasch
published 4
3.65
3.62
Veronique Miro
published
3.60
Laurie Hunter
published
3.60
Steve Turnbull
published
3.52
Rebecca Fox
published
3.51
Lawrence Garlick
published
3.48
Debra Matityahu
published 4
3.41
David Parekh
published 3.5
3.39
Susan Stark
published
3.39
Bradford Meiseles
published 3.5
3.29
Teri Parekh
published
3.12
Bill Somers
published 3.5
Joel Brown
published
Rich Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Parekh + David Parekh7748% games−5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Cannon
17W–21L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.17
Jason Matlof
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.04
4
Joe Liebeschuetz
96W–64L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Mike Jawetz
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Mahi DeSilva
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
Keith Koegler
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Backus
56W–20L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
Michael Kieschnick
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68
4
David Cao
12W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Stacy Reitmeir
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Catharine Garber
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Craig Jorasch
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Colleen Backstrand
21W–20L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Veronique Miro
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.62
Laurie Hunter
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Steve Turnbull
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Rebecca Fox
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lawrence Garlick
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Debra Matityahu
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
David Parekh
50W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Susan Stark
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Bradford Meiseles
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
Teri Parekh
51W–79L career · no lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Bill Somers
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Joel Brown
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rich Craig
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.