Teams

Team Mrozinski

2023 Coppermine Adult 18 & Over · Coppermine Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-11vs Team FungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Gurney / Pamela Dean vs Geraldine Klauber / Maureen Kolb5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Nyman / Terri Mrozinski vs Dao Phan-Vissering / Lolita Blair7-5, 6-3
2023-03-05vs Team FungLost 01
L#2 DoublesSloane Prince / Terri Mrozinski vs Margie Davis / Erin Ipsen0-6, 0-6
2023-02-24vs Team FungLost 01
L#2 DoublesJodi Clary / Terri Mrozinski vs Margie Davis / Erin Ipsen2-6, 1-6
2023-02-05vs Team FungLost 01
L#3 DoublesBonnie Keating / Alexis Davis vs Dao Phan-Vissering / Lolita Blair3-6, 0-6
2023-01-27vs Team FungWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Bonnie Keating vs Beverly Starn / Farzaneh Navid6-4, 7-6
2023-01-15vs Team FungWon 10
W#3 DoublesLauren Gurney / Terri Mrozinski vs Lolita Blair / Buthaina Shukri1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-01-07vs Team FungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Gurney / Megan Hansen vs Geraldine Klauber / Margie Davis5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBonnie Keating / Terri Mrozinski vs Jean Lim / Jill Drew6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lauren Gurney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Shelena Sanderson
published 4.5
4.12
Pamela Dean
published
4.11
Jennifer Cullum
published 4.5
3.92
Beth Steinberg
published 4.5
3.78
Bonnie Keating
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jennifer Nyman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Keating + Terri Mrozinski726052% games+3.1% vs expected
Shelena Sanderson + Terri Mrozinski044 matchesnot enough data
Beth Steinberg + Pamela Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lauren Gurney
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Shelena Sanderson
199W–141L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
4.14
Pamela Dean
40W–40L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jennifer Cullum
22W–32L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Beth Steinberg
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Bonnie Keating
243W–234L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Jennifer Nyman
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.