Teams

GOLD RIVER RC 18AW4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Natalie Halvorsen
published
4.20
Milla Austin
published
4.17
Kirstin Kolpitcke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Kendra Parker Tate
published
4.01
So Jung Yoon
published
3.99
Xuan Li
published
3.97
Lisa Ryan
published
3.97
Michelle Agnew
published
3.95
Sarah Crowell
published
3.91
Laurie Schofield
published
3.91
Teri Ostling
published
3.87
Amy Putty
published 4
3.84
Lisa Maneggie
published
3.79
Kiari Savorn
published
3.78
Dorothea Silva
published
3.78
Holly Pon
published
3.75
Colene Crowley
published 4
3.69
May Zipp
published
Gina Fong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Schofield + Holly Pon4161% games+3.1% vs expected
Kirstin Kolpitcke + So Jung Yoon033 matchesnot enough data
Milla Austin + So Jung Yoon303 matchesnot enough data
Xuan Li + Holly Pon303 matchesnot enough data
So Jung Yoon + Natalie Halvorsen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Halvorsen
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.25
Milla Austin
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Kirstin Kolpitcke
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Kendra Parker Tate
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
So Jung Yoon
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Xuan Li
45W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Lisa Ryan
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Michelle Agnew
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
Sarah Crowell
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Laurie Schofield
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Teri Ostling
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Amy Putty
25W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Lisa Maneggie
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Kiari Savorn
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Dorothea Silva
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Holly Pon
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Colene Crowley
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
May Zipp
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Gina Fong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.