Teams

LA - LATC

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Men 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.39 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-08vs LA - Bel Air RidgeLost 13
L#1 DoublesDan Krasner / Chuck Carrington vs Michael Marley / Frederik Vig3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesFareed Ward vs Christopher Thompson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlbert Chou / Matt Orlando vs Amir Navab / David Spellerberg0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJamie McShane / Jason Brown vs Ryan Rouse / Michael Moshi0-6, 5-7
2025-02-01vs LA - Bel Air RidgeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDan Krasner / Chuck Carrington vs Michael Marley / Gavin Lau2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFareed Ward vs David Spellerberg6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShawn Hatosy / Jamie McShane vs Elan Ruspoli / Joe Chan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJason Brown / Evan Hainey vs Gene Park / Saeed Saed4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Fareed Ward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
Adam Wolf
published 4.5
Chuck Carrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Dan Krasner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Evan Hainey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jamie McShane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Austen Earl
published 4
3.92
Oliver Walsh
published
3.76
Albert Chou
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ivan Fatovic
published 4
Matt Orlando
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Hatosy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Fareed Ward
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Adam Wolf
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Chuck Carrington
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Dan Krasner
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Evan Hainey
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Jamie McShane
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Austen Earl
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.04
Oliver Walsh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Albert Chou
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Ivan Fatovic
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Orlando
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Hatosy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.