Teams

LLTC - GNO

2026 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Singles Wednesday · 4.5 Ladies Singles

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-18vs MPTC - Net Force OneLost 13
W#1 SinglesAmanda Ho vs Kristina Metoyer6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLaura Karbarz vs Kristin Barnes1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKimberly Hang vs Renata Neaton3-6, 3-6
L#4 SinglesStacy Tea vs Vincentia Onuegbulem1-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs MTPC - Baseline BabesWon 30
W#2 SinglesAmanda Ho vs Consuelo Meza6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKimberly Hang vs Erika Jodloman6-4, 7-6
W#4 SinglesLinh Do vs Marisa Martinez6-2, 6-0
2026-02-18vs MPTC - Net Force OneLost 03
L#2 SinglesKimberly Hang vs Quynh Phuong Nguyen6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesStacy Tea vs Vincentia Onuegbulem2-6, 0-6
L#4 SinglesThy Regent vs Kimberly Nguy6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-11vs MTPC - Baseline BabesWon 21
L#1 SinglesLaura Karbarz vs Caroline Montilla3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Ho vs Erika Jodloman6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLinh Do vs Cynthia Boase2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-06vs MTPC - Baseline BabesWon 21
W#2 SinglesAmanda Ho vs Consuelo Meza3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesStacy Tea vs Erika Jodloman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#4 SinglesLinh Do vs Marisa Martinez6-4, 6-4
2026-01-28vs MPTC - Net Force OneLost 01
L#3 SinglesLinh Do vs Renata Neaton4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Ladies Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - GNO06131125198
2MTPC - Baseline Babes06111328187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Amanda Ho
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.64
Linh Do
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #4 Singles 50% · published
3.43
Kimberly Hang
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Thy Regent
usually #4 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Laura Karbarz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.39
Stacy Tea
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #4 Singles 33% · published
Molly Anderson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Ho
73W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.03
Linh Do
78W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Kimberly Hang
34W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Thy Regent
22W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.42
Laura Karbarz
36W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Stacy Tea
68W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Molly Anderson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.