Teams

TOC.Gregson

2025 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-27vs TOC.SaykoLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / Charles Whitehorne vs Jonathan Canon / Visakan Jayakumar2-6, 5-7
2025-04-13vs MD.CrumplerWon 10
W#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Abhi Bhirud6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-30vs TOC.ByrdWon 10
W#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Migel Hidalgo Saldana6-4, 6-4
2025-03-02vs TOC.PozzangheraWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / Charles Whitehorne vs Joshua Ganeles / Sandeep Verghese7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Parv Mital
published
4.43
Rawle Sue-Ho
published
4.31
Tyler Carroll
published
4.22
Kelvin Menezes
published
4.21
Patrick Grant
published
4.16
Matthew Hanauer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Daniel Gallo
published 4.5
4.08
Michael Weslander
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
4.02
Aubry Carmody
published 4
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.87
Robert Beier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Carroll + Parv Mital3259% games+10.7% vs expected
Tyler Carroll + Rawle Sue-Ho10065% games+9.1% vs expected
Charles Whitehorne + Michael Weslander213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parv Mital
35W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.48
Rawle Sue-Ho
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
Tyler Carroll
29W–29L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
4.31
Kelvin Menezes
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
4.22
Patrick Grant
20W–23L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
163W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Daniel Gallo
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Michael Weslander
218W–93L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Aubry Carmody
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.02
Maxwell Gregson
25W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Charles Whitehorne
39W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Robert Beier
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.