Teams

Double Trouble

2025 Corpus Christi 18 & Over USTA Summer Mixed League · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-21vs Net Flicks & ChillWon 21
W#1 DoublesChimene Burnett / Joe Puente vs Diego Setien / Juanita Hernandez6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichelle Jordan / Roy Gonzalez vs Ray Mancias / Katy Thorpe6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarissa Alonzo-Ackerman / Daniel Jordan vs Lina Diaz / Joe Muehlbauer1-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs Tennis the Menace IIIWon 21
W#1 DoublesToni Barrera / Joe Puente vs David Lopez / Daralyn Lopez3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSima Nasr / Roy Gonzalez vs Diana Soto / Miguel Aceves6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Aleman / Jason Hawkins vs Meghan Mandel / Chase Pfaff1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Joe Puente
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.02
Toni Barrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Sima Nasr
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.93
Daniel Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Chimene Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Roy Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.37
Diane Henning
published 2.5
2.35
Pamela Aleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Henry Fulton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sima Nasr + Roy Gonzalez1436% gamesnot enough data
Joe Puente + Diane Henning033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Puente
19W–31L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Toni Barrera
22W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Sima Nasr
31W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Daniel Jordan
12W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Chimene Burnett
24W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Roy Gonzalez
26W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
2.5
Diane Henning
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Pamela Aleman
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman
5W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Henry Fulton
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.