Teams

DO - Peel

2025 Dothan USTA Mixed 40 & Over Summer · 3.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-20vs WTC-Crowley 3.0 40 MixedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Wiesel / Eric Peel vs Marcelo Briones Arciga / Karelia Castillo4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAllison Miller / Devin Snuggs vs Jenny Nelson / Jimmy Huynh6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-16vs WTC-Crowley 3.0 40 MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesBilly Ernst / Jacqueline Ward vs Fidel Castillo / Katrina Leadbetter7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Kingsbury / Debbie Shelton vs Butch Binford / Carol Hundley6-2, 6-1
2025-06-29vs WTC-Crowley 3.0 40 MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Danford / Rick Rikard vs Butch Binford / Katrina Leadbetter7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-24vs WTC-Crowley 3.0 40 MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandra Danford / Devin Snuggs vs Robert Black / Jenny Nelson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Ward / Eric Peel vs Fidel Castillo / Allison Edwards6-0, 6-4
2025-06-16vs WTC-Crowley 3.0 40 MixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Wiesel / Billy Ernst vs Jenny Nelson / Butch Binford2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Shelton / William Kingsbury vs Erin Johnson / Marcelo Briones Arciga6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAllison Miller / Eric Peel vs Katrina Leadbetter / Fidel Castillo0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sandra Danford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Eric Peel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Billy Ernst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Jacqueline Ward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Rick Rikard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Devin Snuggs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Debbie Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Stephanie Wiesel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Kingsbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devin Snuggs + Sandra Danford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Danford
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
Eric Peel
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Billy Ernst
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jacqueline Ward
24W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Rick Rikard
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Devin Snuggs
15W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Debbie Shelton
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Stephanie Wiesel
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Kingsbury
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.