Teams

SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.05 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-30vs MTurturro (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesStacey Herndon / Susan Staley vs Susan Hall / Lori Quattlebaum6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTasha Cooper / Jacqui Gentile vs Lisa Bottle / Kristen Day6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeri Zangmeister / Jurga Petrikis vs Eileen Jones / Mary Turturro4-6, 3-6
2024-04-23vs PReimann/KLucas (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesStacey Herndon / Heather Taylor vs Lisa Morgan / Carrie Letorney5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGabriela ROY / Jacqui Gentile vs Carol Gress / Karen Summers6-1, 6-1
2024-04-18vs SChandler (Raintree)Won 40
W#1 DoublesCourtney Warner / Kelli Massaro vs Kimberly Powell / Tricia Shaw7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSusan Staley vs Elizabeth Harvey4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSally Blocksom / Jacqui Gentile vs Vicky Shannon / Theresa Joiner6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTasha Cooper / Nanette Murphy vs Kirstin Martin / Katherine Reeves6-3, 6-1
2024-04-16vs CPrager (Sardis)Won 31
W#1 DoublesKelli Massaro / Jacqui Gentile vs Holly Foley / Mandy Occhipinti6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Kate Johnson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Staley / Sally Blocksom vs Jennifer Zarins / Katherine Currier6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNanette Murphy / Jurga Petrikis vs Tracy Thomas / Cathie DeCramer2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-30vs KLee/SChandra (CTNC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney Warner / Kelli Massaro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJurga Petrikis / Nanette Murphy vs Jodi VonEschen / Lauren Baynham7-5, 6-2
2024-03-19vs JAckerlund (Life Time)Won 40
W#1 DoublesKelli Massaro / Gabriela ROY vs Lou Rives / Tracy Denning6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJurga Petrikis vs Shannen Hepperla6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Staley / Sally Blocksom vs Kelly Farfour / Tania Inga6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Herndon / Jeri Zangmeister vs Ashley Pitt / Elana Blake6-3, 6-0
2024-03-12vs NO'Brien/OBanchik (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSally Blocksom / Courtney Warner vs Naomi O'Brien / Olya Banchik6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJacqui Gentile / Phyllis Waud vs JoAnn Cho / Saima Barkat3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesKelli Massaro / Gabriela ROY vs Lisa Monty / Jane Moncayo6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStacey Herndon / Susan Staley vs Annie Shook-Maier / Laura Hatfield7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTasha Cooper / Jurga Petrikis vs Amy MacDonnell / Kattiuska Mogelefsky6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Courtney Warner
published 3
3.17
Gabriela ROY
published 3
3.03
Stacey Herndon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.02
Kelli Massaro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.91
Nanette Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Susan Staley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.89
Sally Blocksom
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Kathy Aitken
published
2.81
Jurga Petrikis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.73
Tasha Cooper
published
2.71
Jacqui Gentile
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.69
Martha Lowman
published 3
Jeri Zangmeister
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Staley + Stacey Herndon9652% games−9.4% vs expected
Sally Blocksom + Susan Staley14955% games−11.2% vs expected
Jurga Petrikis + Susan Staley3349% gamesnot enough data
Susan Staley + Nanette Murphy4169% gamesnot enough data
Jurga Petrikis + Tasha Cooper044 matchesnot enough data
Sally Blocksom + Stacey Herndon314 matchesnot enough data
Jacqui Gentile + Stacey Herndon314 matchesnot enough data
Jurga Petrikis + Stacey Herndon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Courtney Warner
31W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
3
Gabriela ROY
43W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.17
3
Stacey Herndon
105W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Kelli Massaro
56W–85L career · type A · 9 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Nanette Murphy
87W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Susan Staley
112W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Sally Blocksom
129W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.89
Kathy Aitken
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Jurga Petrikis
63W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Tasha Cooper
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jacqui Gentile
97W–98L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Martha Lowman
44W–71L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Jeri Zangmeister
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.