Teams

HHerndon-CHTC

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 22 6:30 PM
UNC Faculty Staff Recreation Association
Sep 29 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
Oct 6 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
2026-09-01vs LBible.40.7.5C-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth McNamara / Lynne Farber vs Cary Armstrong / Kristin Cooley5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mersereau / Kelly Jarrett vs Elizabeth Harvie / Santae Cooper7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Herndon / Ulrike Foley vs Anne Costello / Lindsay Mize7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-25vs KLaan.40.7.5C-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny Perry / Kelly Jarrett vs Kelly Johnson / Karli Eller0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth McNamara / Heather Herndon vs Jenna Schreiber / Sarah Franks2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSheridan Meltsner / Meghan Smith vs Miho Ogura / Wendy Lindberg4-6, 4-6
2026-08-18vs LEdgar.40C-UNCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mersereau / Sheridan Meltsner vs Heidi Lanford / Lynn Edgar2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Jarrett / Noreen McDonald vs Lisa Watkins / Marti Jenkins6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRegina Davis / Ulrike Foley vs Terri Tarrant / Ellen Reich6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HHerndon-CHTC1030115
2TPerrone.40C-DUR1021223
3KLaan.40.7.5C-DUR1021227
4LBible.40.7.5C-DUR0112427
5JBarrow.7.5C-HR0112431
6LEdgar.40C-UNC0103633

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Oxana Gorbacheva
published
3.78
Elizabeth McNamara
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Ulrike Foley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Noreen McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Jenny Perry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Jennifer Mersereau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Sheridan Meltsner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Meghan Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Melissa Fitzpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Kelly Jarrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Denise Corey
published 3.5
3.18
Lynne Farber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Regina Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Fitzpatrick + Meghan Smith5357% games+0.6% vs expected
Melissa Fitzpatrick + Jennifer Mersereau4167% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Fitzpatrick + Regina Davis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oxana Gorbacheva
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
Elizabeth McNamara
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ulrike Foley
81W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Noreen McDonald
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jenny Perry
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Jennifer Mersereau
60W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
4
Sheridan Meltsner
95W–123L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Meghan Smith
160W–93L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Melissa Fitzpatrick
39W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Kelly Jarrett
7W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Denise Corey
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Lynne Farber
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.