Teams

ACAC Linderman

2023 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Women · Richmond Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-19vs MTC Reynolds 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesValerie Stephens / Hilary Brodsky vs Norma Kimbrel / Ludi Webber7-6, 6-0
2023-05-12vs Stonehenge SnavelyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Linderman / Valerie Stephens vs Susan Burns / Zoe Emerson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-07vs ACAC LarueLost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Stephens / Jo Tucker vs Judy Napier / Linda Larue0-6, 3-6
2023-05-05vs Raintree DarlingLost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Stephens / Hilary Brodsky vs Lorraine McGehee / Donna Moody2-6, 1-6
2023-04-21vs ACAC BartholomewLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Linderman / Valerie Stephens vs Paula Bissett / Linnea Engel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-14vs Westwood SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Stephens / Diane Linderman vs Barbara Copley / Sheryl Highfill3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jane Riddle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Diane Linderman
published 3.5
3.10
Dawn MacHonis
published 3.5
2.90
Hilary Brodsky
published
2.85
Valerie Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alicia Barnett
published 3
2.66
Jackie Granger
published
Donna Barrett
published
Jennifer Cubitt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jane Riddle
105W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Diane Linderman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dawn MacHonis
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Hilary Brodsky
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Valerie Stephens
125W–104L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Alicia Barnett
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
Donna Barrett
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Cubitt
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.