Teams

PLEASANTON CW8.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 8.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Fenny Widjaja
published
4.03
Martha Matrisian
published
4.01
Michelle McDermott
published
3.94
Karlene Steelman
published
3.93
Ashley Kechter
published 4.5
3.81
3.79
Jill Van Slyke
published
3.74
Andrea Callaway
published 4
3.72
Raquel Atkin
published
3.71
Stephanie Kasirajan
published
3.70
3.62
Susan Aneja
published
3.60
Nicole Shay
published
3.33
Sarah Russell
published
Kimiko Kearney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Broda-Schunck + Jill Van Slyke134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Russell + Karlene Steelman213 matchesnot enough data
Marilyn Morrell-Kristal + Raquel Atkin033 matchesnot enough data
Jill Van Slyke + Raquel Atkin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fenny Widjaja
23W–27L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Martha Matrisian
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Michelle McDermott
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
Karlene Steelman
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.94
4.5
Ashley Kechter
0W–11L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.93
Joanna Broda-Schunck
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.81
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.79
4
Andrea Callaway
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Raquel Atkin
7W–24L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
Stephanie Kasirajan
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Marilyn Morrell-Kristal
1W–21L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.70
Susan Aneja
37W–31L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
Nicole Shay
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Sarah Russell
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.33
Kimiko Kearney
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.