Teams

HHigh/PGolding (Southampton)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-08vs BSwann (Pine Lake)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCheri Johnson / Denise Bost vs Tracy Graham / Karan Waddell3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaige Golding / Michelle Davis vs Cathy White / Susan Brightwell6-1, 6-2
2023-05-01vs SAdditon/VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJanice Daniel / Denise Bost vs Loretta Anderson / Teresa Richardson1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Paige Golding vs Sandi Lovell / Claudia Ridley6-4, 6-2
2023-04-24vs JMu/KStepp (Park Road)Won 20
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Patrice Forbes vs Dorothy Garrity / Claudia Banner6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSarah Terrio / Michelle Davis vs Joyce Mu / Anita Matai6-2, 6-1
2023-04-17vs SBrown/KWagner (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPauline Styers / Christine Barnes vs Kim Walsh / Kate Wagner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Anne-Bee van Meter vs Traci Semones / Stacey Brown1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-10vs MHabegger (Colonel Beatty)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJanice Daniel / Denise Bost vs Melissa Habegger / Caroline Lapointe1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Patrice Forbes vs Amanda Cheek / Kate Loor6-7, 3-6
2023-04-03vs KCrane (Palisades)Won 30
W#1 DoublesHolli High / Denise Bost vs Kelli Crane / Cecile Yager6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Anne-Bee van Meter vs Joy Landesman / Rene Ernest7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Chitu / Sarah Terrio vs Michelle Borisenko / Debbie Wilson6-4, 7-6
W#1 DoublesChristine Barnes / Denise Bost vs Amy Iannuzzi / Jill Halverstam6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Jan Waller vs Melinda van Hecke / Toni Evans6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatrice Forbes / Teri Iezzi vs Susan Blackman / Suzanne Purdy6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Barnes / Sarah Terrio vs Melissa Murphy / Sheryl Bucci6-0, 6-3
2023-03-06vs WLutgring (Ballantyne)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Denise Bost vs Wendy Lutgring / Holly Disser3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPaige Golding vs April Pacheco6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Michelle Davis vs Irene Rapaglia / Carlene Delorenzo0-6, 4-6
2023-02-27vs MFreeman/EButler (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPaige Golding / Anne-Bee van Meter vs Edie Butler Rowe / Julie Linder3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHolli High / Pauline Styers vs Maebeth Hill / Christina Pardi5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Jan Waller vs Michelle Winterich / Peggy Hoffman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Sarah Terrio
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Denise Bost
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Janice Daniel
published
3.30
Paige Golding
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.29
Melissa Chitu
published
Anne-Bee van Meter
published 3.5
3.19
Holli High
published
3.17
Cheri Johnson
published 3.5
3.10
Teri Iezzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Pauline Styers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Patrice Forbes
published
2.89
Janet Layne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Terrio + Denise Bost8162% games+5.6% vs expected
Teri Iezzi + Denise Bost2548% gamesnot enough data
Paige Golding + Teri Iezzi1440% gamesnot enough data
Pauline Styers + Denise Bost3251% gamesnot enough data
Janice Daniel + Paige Golding314 matchesnot enough data
Janice Daniel + Pauline Styers123 matchesnot enough data
Paige Golding + Pauline Styers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sarah Terrio
99W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Denise Bost
205W–139L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Janice Daniel
17W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Paige Golding
73W–45L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Melissa Chitu
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anne-Bee van Meter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Holli High
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheri Johnson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Teri Iezzi
110W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Pauline Styers
67W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.93
Patrice Forbes
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
Janet Layne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.