Teams

Plant City Dashing Divas - J. Holbrook

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-22vs Grand Hampton - M. QuinonesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Denisse Riddle vs Cynthia Ciarpelli / Kristi Schorr6-3, 6-4
2023-05-15vs Palma Ceia Penn Pirates - N. GomezLost 02
L#1 DoublesTyra Hunt / Patricia Smith vs Nicole Gomez / Jennifer Sawyer2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Jackie Wyckoff vs Suzanne Glickman / ALLISON BURDEN3-6, 3-6
2023-05-08vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheila Brown / Tyra Hunt vs Kelley Coffey / Sandra Bell4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Susan Rind vs Courtney Craig / Colette O'Connor6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-03vs Hills/T. Hartigan/40&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Flaherty / Julianna Holbrook vs Tobey Hartigan / Sejal Alvarez1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Smith / Tyra Hunt vs Dorothy Flair / Tina Warmbier3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-24vs Buckhorn Matchmakers - N. EvansSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatricia Smith / Tyra Hunt vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Denisse Riddle vs Christina Sullivan / Debra Campos6-4, 7-5
2023-04-10vs Buckhorn Sweetspots - C. DemingWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Patricia Smith vs Ginger Anzalone / Barbara Kouimanis6-3, 7-6
2023-04-03vs Yachty By Nature - L. DavittWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Smith / Tyra Hunt vs Erica Brandon / Jennifer Harrell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tyra Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Amy Flaherty
published 3
2.78
Christine Assefa
published 3
2.65
Dianna Lott
published 3
2.55
Patricia Smith
published
2.55
Sheila Brown
published
2.55
Jackie Wyckoff
published 3
2.38
Susan Rind
published
2.37
Julianna Holbrook
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julianna Holbrook + Susan Rind134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Smith + Susan Rind033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tyra Hunt
107W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
3
Amy Flaherty
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Christine Assefa
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Dianna Lott
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
Patricia Smith
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
Sheila Brown
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Jackie Wyckoff
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Susan Rind
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.38
Julianna Holbrook
60W–151L career · 7 lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.