Teams

LA - Lobsters

2026 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs LA - Mooney Mates Mixed TapeWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Haroutunian / David Matthews vs Ryan Greene / Marlee Zeman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Lee / Katie Lagen vs David Kilian / Courtney Rice6-1, 6-2
2026-02-22vs LA - The MixersWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaige Triplett / Leonardo Dionisio vs Aditya Shah / Veronika Zherdeva6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Lagen / David Lee vs Caroline Liao / Diego Tapia6-3, 6-4
2026-02-15vs LA - Not Our FaultLost 03
L#1 DoublesIgal Litovsky / Lisa Haroutunian vs Carlos Yugar / Angelica Weaver5-7, 6-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTom Dale / Brenna Opelka vs Joshua Luo / Vy Bui3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Liu / Elyse Wolin vs Shayan Dhanani / Erica Eastrich1-6, 4-6
2026-02-13vs LA - Kiss My Ace MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Haroutunian / Igal Litovsky vs Morgan Duff / Kelly Duong3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeonardo Dionisio / Katie Lagen vs Kevin Rodriguez / Yoko Ogihara6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKara Brevet / Don Kim vs Jefferson Ma / Hannah So0-6, 1-6
2026-01-31vs LA - Queen Anne 7.0 AdWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrenna Opelka / Leonardo Dionisio vs Dan Hwang / Marie Roco6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSpencer Schlesinger / Pierce Diamond vs Will Parks / Joyce Liang4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Lee / Katie Lagen vs Anthony Yoo / Seldy Gray6-3, 6-2
2026-01-25vs LA - Strings AttachedWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Haroutunian / Igal Litovsky vs Luca Pirani / Cindy Shih6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrenna Opelka / David Matthews vs Tom Hudson / Tina Nili-Black7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Liu / Elyse Wolin vs Bethany Dubick / Stephen Kim0-6, 2-6
2026-01-17vs LA - ChallengersWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrenna Opelka / David Matthews vs Chris Kula / Diana Galaviz3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKamila Edwards / Tom Dale vs Vinh Nguyen / Daniela Weiss7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSpencer Schlesinger / Don Kim vs Damien Aries / Sara Sherman6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesPaige Triplett / Leonardo Dionisio vs Matthew Lam / Jenny Chen6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIgal Litovsky / Kamila Edwards vs Stefano Cosentino / Madeleine Neuville0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKara Brevet / David Lee vs Bryan Kariuki / Sharon Zhu7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - Lobsters6215923208
2LA - Kiss My Ace Mixed6215923217
3LA LLW Queen Anne 7.0 Deuce - John Gonzalez5316816163
4LA - Not Our Fault53141024212
5LA - Wise Aces3481327207
6LA - Queen Anne 7.0 Ad35111328225
7LA - WeHo Slicers Mixed 7.035101431234
8LA - Mooney Mates Mixed Tape35101432248
9LA - The Mixers2571430225
10LA - Challengers0871737252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Katie Lagen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.68
Lisa Haroutunian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Leonardo Dionisio
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Elyse Wolin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Kamila Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Paige Triplett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Brenna Opelka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Tom Dale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Igal Litovsky
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Kara Brevet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Spencer Schlesinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Pierce Diamond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Haroutunian + Igal Litovsky123 matchesnot enough data
Spencer Schlesinger + Kara Brevet213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie Lagen
68W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.78
Lisa Haroutunian
60W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.68
Leonardo Dionisio
21W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Elyse Wolin
20W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kamila Edwards
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Paige Triplett
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Brenna Opelka
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Tom Dale
27W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
3.5
Igal Litovsky
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Kara Brevet
64W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Spencer Schlesinger
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Pierce Diamond
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.