Teams

SenioRitas 7.0

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Ladies 7.0 55s

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 7.0 55s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Carol Meriwether
published 3.5
3.28
Carol Pickering
published 3.5
3.25
Gina Wendes
published 3.5
Cynthia Oliver
published 3.5
3.20
Teri Paxton
published
3.18
Martha Woolverton
published
3.15
Liz Stringer
published
3.13
Kathy Riddle
published
3.11
Astrid Mohn
published 3.5
2.95
Sheryl Shuster
published
Gloria Hughes
published 3
Hazel Norton
published 3
Sheryl DeCaprio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Meriwether + Carol Pickering14559% games+4.1% vs expected
Gloria Hughes + Liz Stringer5258% games−2.8% vs expected
Sheryl DeCaprio + Cynthia Oliver3547% games−4.9% vs expected
Sheryl Shuster + Carol Pickering2348% games−5.7% vs expected
Hazel Norton + Carol Meriwether3845% games−7.2% vs expected
Astrid Mohn + Teri Paxton31044% games−10.5% vs expected
Gloria Hughes + Carol Meriwether0535% gamesnot enough data
Martha Woolverton + Liz Stringer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Meriwether
72W–47L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Carol Pickering
64W–46L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gina Wendes
20W–35L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Cynthia Oliver
15W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teri Paxton
46W–54L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Martha Woolverton
27W–31L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Liz Stringer
40W–36L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kathy Riddle
27W–40L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Astrid Mohn
30W–26L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Sheryl Shuster
32W–40L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Gloria Hughes
20W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Hazel Norton
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheryl DeCaprio
22W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.