Teams

Sherrell - Faulkner

2025 NETX Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-19vs Hinshaw-Longview High SchoolWon 31
W#1 DoublesJill Johnson / Erin Jasper vs Lisa Hinshaw / Phyllis Jolley Smith6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesReannine Teer vs Laura Rectenwald7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Losack / Jaclyn Sherrell vs Amy Kennedy / Toni Sharp6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPenny Spellman / Melinda Ross vs Charlotte Jackson / Kandy Wharton0-6, 0-6
2025-05-12vs Anderson - TASCWon 31
W#1 SinglesAlisa Simmons vs Hannah Leitner1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Estes / Brooke Swann vs Jennifer Johnston / Emily Skoog3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKaty Hill vs Mechele Mills6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Koeffler / Penny Spellman vs Sherry Ray / Tanya Redic6-1, 6-0
2025-04-28vs Porter/Gadek-HollytreeWon 41
L#1 DoublesShera-Donne Lee / Alisa Simmons vs Jennifer Gadek / Sharon Wynne4-6, 2-3
W#1 SinglesJill Hamil vs Hilary Hymer6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Jackson / Aimee Krog vs Jennifer Smith / Amy Guthrie6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLauren Mayer vs Alison Simmons6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Losack / Melinda Ross vs Kelli Cromer / Jennifer Jeffress7-6, 6-3
2025-04-21vs Anderson - TASCWon 50
W#1 DoublesHannah Estes / Aimee Krog vs Erin Schroeder / Kathryn Smith6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaty Hill vs Hannah Leitner6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShera-Donne Lee / Alisa Simmons vs Katy Link / Mechele Mills6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesReannine Teer vs Stephanie Wilson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin Jasper / Katherine Koeffler vs Farrah Johnson / Sherry Ray6-0, 6-0
2025-04-14vs Hinshaw-Longview High SchoolWon 41
W#1 DoublesMelinda Ross / Alisa Simmons vs Toni Sharp / Laura Rectenwald6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Mayer vs Julie Caswell6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJaclyn Sherrell / Lisa Losack vs Lori Corpier / Kandy Wharton6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesErin Jasper vs Megan Roberts3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaty Hill / Brooke Swann vs Heather Surholt / Cara Jordan6-4, 7-6
2025-04-07vs Porter/Gadek-HollytreeWon 50
W#1 DoublesAimee Krog / Hannah Estes vs Kelli Cromer / Jennifer Jeffress6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Mayer vs Hilary Hymer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJill Hamil / Melinda Ross vs Rebekah Singleton / Amy Guthrie6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesReannine Teer vs Jennifer Gadek6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJaclyn Sherrell / Lisa Losack vs Heather Hill / Martha Schulz6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Lauren Mayer
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.19
Reannine Teer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.03
Jill Hamil
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.01
Lisa Losack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Jaclyn Sherrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Aimee Krog
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Erin Jasper
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Shera-Donne Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Melinda Ross
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Alisa Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.74
Hannah Estes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Penny Spellman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Koeffler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katy Hill
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaclyn Sherrell + Lisa Losack151053% games+5.0% vs expected
Alisa Simmons + Shera-Donne Lee3258% games+0.2% vs expected
Penny Spellman + Melinda Ross2645% games−4.7% vs expected
Aimee Krog + Hannah Estes5166% gamesnot enough data
Shera-Donne Lee + Jill Hamil224 matchesnot enough data
Jill Hamil + Melinda Ross314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Mayer
17W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Reannine Teer
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.19
Jill Hamil
38W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Lisa Losack
41W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Jaclyn Sherrell
29W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Aimee Krog
12W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Erin Jasper
6W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Shera-Donne Lee
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Melinda Ross
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Alisa Simmons
14W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Hannah Estes
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Penny Spellman
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Katherine Koeffler
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katy Hill
14W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.