Teams

Beasley/18/5.5/CW/LCRC

2025 Lake Charles Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women · 5.5 LC (18&O) Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-12vs Rutland/18/5.5/CW/LCRCSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Hebert / Dominique Noel Chaisson vs Melissa Lewis / Whitney Curole4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSchantel Viator / Mary Bayles vs Mila Robichaux / Rachel Bargas6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-10-05vs Mouton/Brescher/18/5.5/Combo/GWWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Harper / Peyton Pawlicki vs Jennifer Black / Amelia Crawford2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMallory Beasley / Ashton Smith vs Shelly Brescher / Kayla LeJeune6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheree Nicole Chapman / Adrienne Hebert vs Jessica Williamson / Maria Faul6-1, 6-4
2025-09-30vs Callaba/18/5.5/CW/LCRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolli Abate / Peyton Pawlicki vs Rachel Lindgren / Tabitha Morrow6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Hebert / Wendy Kennison vs Anne Kuhne / Catherine Osbourn4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMallory Beasley / Dominique Noel Chaisson vs Lauren Olsen / June Green6-0, 6-1
2025-09-28vs Black/18/5.5/CW/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Harper / Katie Benoit vs CHRISTY VALENTINE / Rachel Hoffpauir6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Bayles / Adrienne Hebert vs Krissy Morris / Katelyn Matthews6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMallory Beasley / Schantel Viator vs Brittany Black / Alicia Claudio6-2, 6-2
2025-09-14vs Callaba/18/5.5/CW/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolli Abate / Katie Benoit vs Emmie Gonsoulin / Chelsea Laurent6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWendy Kennison / Peyton Pawlicki vs Anne Kuhne / Laurie Callaba6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDominique Noel Chaisson / Schantel Viator vs June Green / Lauren Olsen6-1, 6-2
2025-09-07vs Rutland/18/5.5/CW/LCRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Benoit / Ashton Smith vs Stefanie Nixon / Brittany Landry6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMallory Beasley / Dominique Noel Chaisson vs Whitney Curole / Emily Pierce6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheree Nicole Chapman / Adrienne Hebert vs Tiffany Rutland / Elizabeth Goodwin6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-31vs Mouton/Brescher/18/5.5/Combo/GWWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Harper / Peyton Pawlicki vs Jennifer Black / Amanda Keating7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshton Smith / Katie Benoit vs Blair Lumpkin / Maria Faul7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMallory Beasley / Holli Abate vs Suzanne Guillory / Erin Stewart6-2, 6-0
2025-08-19vs Black/18/5.5/CW/LCRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Harper / Peyton Pawlicki vs CHRISTY VALENTINE / Krissy Morris7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Hebert / Wendy Kennison vs Dawn Redd / Andrea White6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMary Bayles / Schantel Viator vs Katelyn Matthews / Paige Daboval0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 LC (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Peyton Pawlicki
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
Holli Abate
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Ashton Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Wendy Harper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Cheree Nicole Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Wendy Kennison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Mallory Beasley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Mary Bayles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Adrienne Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Schantel Viator
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dominique Noel Chaisson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Harper + Peyton Pawlicki303 matchesnot enough data
Adrienne Hebert + Cheree Nicole Chapman303 matchesnot enough data
Holli Abate + Peyton Pawlicki303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peyton Pawlicki
19W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Holli Abate
18W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Ashton Smith
34W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Wendy Harper
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Cheree Nicole Chapman
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Wendy Kennison
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Mallory Beasley
16W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Mary Bayles
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Adrienne Hebert
19W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Schantel Viator
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Dominique Noel Chaisson
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.