Teams

9-CCarrico-HVCC

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-02vs 2-DCorey/RDavis-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pyle / Cecily Peterson vs Melissa Fitzpatrick / Sarah DeVore4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Perun / Ruth Caccavale vs Denise Corey / Lynne Farber2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-09-20vs 4-KLaan-Eno 40 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesRuth Caccavale / Cecily Peterson vs Sara Lawrence / Kolleen Fitzgerald6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Perun / Thekla Pappas vs Kinsey Wennerstrom / Lauren Muth Humphreys6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-10vs 8-KDugan-DFCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pyle / Cecily Peterson vs Susan Alden / Emily McClernon7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-24vs 11-TPrinstein-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pyle / Stephanie Perun vs Carrie Norry / Cheryl Bock1-6, 2-6
2023-08-21vs 7-BBlanc-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pyle / Stephanie Perun vs Jannette White / Sabrina Kane6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Jennifer Pyle
published
3.14
Joan Mueller
published
3.09
Ruth Caccavale
published
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
published 3
3.03
Thekla Pappas
published
2.94
Carolyn Davidson
published 3
2.90
Laurie Myer
published
2.84
Stephanie Perun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Mary Grigg
published
Beth Sholtz
published 3
2.71
Caroline Carrico
published 3
2.46
Susan Peak
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Pyle
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Joan Mueller
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Ruth Caccavale
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Thekla Pappas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Carolyn Davidson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
Laurie Myer
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Stephanie Perun
34W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Mary Grigg
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Beth Sholtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Caroline Carrico
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Susan Peak
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.