Teams

OC Lifetime SC - Tiffney

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

20 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-08-09vs The Huntington Club - JoLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Colson / Sophie Sanchez vs Jacqueline Jernigan / Shelly Hilliard4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Michelle Duenas
published
3.65
Ladawn Stone
published
3.64
Chelsea van Niekerk
published 3.5
3.62
Janice Trojan
published 4
3.62
Marcella Cangelosi
published
3.48
Bev Merwin
published 3.5
3.46
Crosby Burke
published 3.5
3.44
Shelby Houle
published
3.38
Samantha Ackad
published
3.29
Stephanie Colson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Darlene Redburn
published 3.5
3.22
Natalie Finn
published 3.5
3.18
Darcy Kendrick
published 3.5
3.14
Sophie Sanchez
published
3.11
MeganMary Mills
published
3.09
Chrissy Bird
published 3.5
3.00
Tiffney Beckloff
published
2.80
Sue Michailidis
published
2.75
Lois Russell
published
Jeanine Bast
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darcy Kendrick + Marcella Cangelosi2341% games−8.7% vs expected
Tiffney Beckloff + Chrissy Bird134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Duenas
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Ladawn Stone
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Chelsea van Niekerk
36W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.64
4
Janice Trojan
27W–39L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
Marcella Cangelosi
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Bev Merwin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Crosby Burke
22W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Shelby Houle
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Samantha Ackad
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Stephanie Colson
41W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Darlene Redburn
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Natalie Finn
16W–32L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Darcy Kendrick
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
Sophie Sanchez
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
MeganMary Mills
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Chrissy Bird
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Tiffney Beckloff
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Sue Michailidis
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Lois Russell
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Jeanine Bast
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.