Teams

TNT Aragon 8.0

2025 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-20vs Smart Aces 8.0-SprowWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Sullivan / Joseph Yoshimura vs Jason Gordon / Amy French6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuis Aragon / Jena Olsen vs Dusten Rees / Kristin Shifflett6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Thomas / Dorota Sipko vs Gregg Sprow / Emily Sereno3-6, 1-6
2025-03-13vs Smart Aces 8.0-SprowLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Yoshimura / Jena Olsen vs Dusten Rees / Kristin Shifflett3-6, 4-6
2025-03-06vs Smart Aces 8.0-SprowWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Sullivan / Joseph Yoshimura vs Jason Gordon / Amy French2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-22vs Smart Aces 8.0-SprowWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Sullivan / Joseph Yoshimura vs Bret Shifflett / Lauren Burgher6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLuis Aragon / Jena Olsen vs Gregg Sprow / Kim Gudyka6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDorota Sipko / Bill Thomas vs Jason Gordon / Amy French3-6, 3-6
2025-02-06vs Smart Aces 8.0-SprowWon 10
W#2 DoublesLuis Aragon / Jena Olsen vs Bret Shifflett / Kim Gudyka6-3, 7-6
2025-01-23vs Smart Aces 8.0-SprowWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Sullivan / Joseph Yoshimura vs Gregg Sprow / Amy French5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-16vs Smart Aces 8.0-SprowWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Sullivan / Joseph Yoshimura vs Curtis Harris / Emily Sereno6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Jena Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Melissa Sullivan
published
3.73
Bill Thomas
published 4
3.65
Keyona Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Luis Aragon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Joseph Yoshimura
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
James Lincoln
published
3.31
Dorota Sipko
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Pat Gillespie
published
Patricia Villasmil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorota Sipko + Joseph Yoshimura13167% gamesnot enough data
Jena Olsen + Luis Aragon044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jena Olsen
38W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Melissa Sullivan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.88
4
Bill Thomas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Keyona Bell
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.65
Luis Aragon
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Joseph Yoshimura
112W–37L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
James Lincoln
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Pat Gillespie
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Villasmil
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.