Teams

Buttonwood/Madden

2026 IRMSL Adult 40 & Over WINTER · 4.5 Women-Sun

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-03vs IRMSL/RunkSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cone / Laura Williams vs Krista Geoffrion / Sharon Runk6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPollyanna Clark vs Kathleen Fernandes5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon DeGaetano / Abigail Flood vs Laurin Stocker / Saana Ingram5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Chloe Spruill vs Jill Rickey / Lillie Hileman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-19vs IRMSL/RunkSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Laura Williams vs Saana Ingram / Jill Rickey6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPollyanna Clark vs Lillie Hileman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKarin Decoste / Christina Lovera vs Kathleen Fernandes / Andrea Cornelissen3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSharon DeGaetano / Abigail Flood vs Laurin Stocker / Linden Hass3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-12vs IRMSL/RunkLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Chloe Spruill vs Giselle Asplundh / Tanja Gustafson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Williams / Christina Lovera vs Erin Lepone / Ruthly Lesane4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Vallecillo-Dunn / Abigail Flood vs Krista Geoffrion / Tere Stowell6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-22vs IRMSL/RunkSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSharon DeGaetano / Christina Lovera vs Giselle Asplundh / Tanja Gustafson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPollyanna Clark vs Kristin Elliott2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Cone / Laura Williams vs Laurin Stocker / Guadalupe Avinzano6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChloe Spruill / Marguerite Madden vs Sharon Runk / Lillie Hileman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-01vs IRMSL/RunkSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeborah Cone / Maria Vallecillo-Dunn vs Giselle Asplundh / Laurin Stocker3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDaniela Esswein vs Kristin Elliott3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Chloe Spruill vs Guadalupe Avinzano / Ruthly Lesane6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKarin Decoste / Laura Williams vs Krista Geoffrion / Jill Rickey6-0, 6-2
2026-02-22vs IRMSL/RunkLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Daniela Esswein vs Laurin Stocker / Guadalupe Avinzano3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPollyanna Clark vs Andrea Wohlschlaeger6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon DeGaetano / Karin Decoste vs Giselle Asplundh / Tanja Gustafson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Cone / Laura Williams vs Linden Hass / Erin Lepone6-2, 6-2
2026-02-15vs IRMSL/RunkLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristina Lovera / Laura Williams vs Tere Stowell / Tanja Gustafson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesPollyanna Clark vs Kristin Elliott3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Chloe Spruill vs Andrea Wohlschlaeger / Guadalupe Avinzano7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeborah Cone / Karin Decoste vs Erin Lepone / Ruthly Lesane4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women-Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Deborah Cone
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.37
Chloe Spruill
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Marguerite Madden
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.32
Karin Decoste
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Daniela Esswein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Abigail Flood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Pollyanna Clark
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.05
Christina Lovera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Sharon DeGaetano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Maria Vallecillo-Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chloe Spruill + Marguerite Madden5060% games+5.7% vs expected
Pollyanna Clark + Marguerite Madden303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deborah Cone
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.43
4.5
Chloe Spruill
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Marguerite Madden
114W–45L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.34
Karin Decoste
55W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Daniela Esswein
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Abigail Flood
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
4.15
Pollyanna Clark
25W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Christina Lovera
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
Sharon DeGaetano
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.99
Maria Vallecillo-Dunn
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.