Teams

LoVV

2023 Prince Georges Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Prince Georges Mixed Doubles 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesMartin Booker / Sheila Jennings vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-04vs LA AcersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDennis DuPree / Stephanie Smith vs LaShel Baravechia / Desmond LaMar6-7, 5-3
2023-02-25vs JTCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarlene Walker / Dennis DuPree vs Marissa Schmauch Womble / Jon Anders3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesConstance Manning / Nathaniel Davis vs Ilona Teleki / Xavier Rouse6-3, 7-6
2023-02-19vs LA AcersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesConstance Manning / Lycurtis Wortham vs Antonio Banks / Beverly Taylor6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Boggan / Sheila Jennings vs Melvin Williams / Maria Miller4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-11vs JTCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDarlene Walker / Dennis DuPree vs Daniel Bischof / Jane Kim2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMartin Booker / Constance Manning vs Jon Anders / Venita Cooper2-6, 1-6
2023-02-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesConstance Manning / Lycurtis Wortham vs Annette James / John Burns4-6, 1-6
2023-01-29vs JTCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesConstance Manning / Lycurtis Wortham vs Venita Cooper / Tony Clark6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMartin Booker / Sheila Jennings vs Ilona Teleki / Daniel Bischof1-6, 0-6
2023-01-21vs JTCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesNathaniel Davis / Constance Manning vs Marissa Schmauch Womble / Leonardo Balieiro6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Prince Georges Mixed Doubles 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Bernadette Walker
published 3.5
2.87
Nathaniel Davis
published
2.84
Constance Manning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
2.65
Sheila Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Dennis DuPree
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.50
Martha Givan
published
Lycurtis Wortham
published
Martin Booker
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bernadette Walker
28W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Nathaniel Davis
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Constance Manning
91W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Brittany Jennings
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Sheila Jennings
75W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Dennis DuPree
27W–52L career · 7 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
Martha Givan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Lycurtis Wortham
15W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martin Booker
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.