Teams

LAGR-Griffin-Light/Jetton

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Women 6.5 Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-07vs LLDA-Dayton/River RunLost 01
L#1 DoublesSherry Carpenter / Elizabeth Johnson vs Dawn Bush / Susan Falcone4-6, 4-6
2024-10-03vs LKPO-Powell/WestportWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherry Carpenter / Suzun McCrary vs Melissa Collins / Carrie Davin7-6, 7-5
2024-09-19vs LNKA-Kadlecik-Takes/EdgemoorWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzun McCrary / Sherry Carpenter vs Julia Mueller / Brenda Kadlecik6-4, 6-4
2024-09-18vs LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 6.5 Thurs 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzun McCrary / Lori Holmes vs Beth Packard / Kathy Murphy1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-11vs LHNY-Nyquist/Jetton 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzun McCrary / Lori Holmes vs Kathleen Rissberger / Heather MacFadyen3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Scruggs / Susan Newman vs Megan Hartley / Natalie Reid2-6, 3-6
2024-08-22vs LSCU-Cune/CSD 55+ 6.5 Thurs pmWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Sherry Carpenter vs SONJA ROCHER / Sheila Reitler6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
3.19
Sharon McAfee
published
3.19
Amy Light
published 3.5
3.17
Anita Honeycutt
published 3.5
3.11
Suzun McCrary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.06
Katie Scruggs
published
2.97
Sherry Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Jacqueline Hare
published
2.80
Susan Newman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Andrea Aunon
published 3
2.68
Karen Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Newman + Sherry Carpenter4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Tattersfield
117W–55L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Sharon McAfee
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Light
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Anita Honeycutt
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Suzun McCrary
83W–87L career · 8 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Katie Scruggs
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Sherry Carpenter
69W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jacqueline Hare
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Susan Newman
38W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Andrea Aunon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Cooper
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.