Teams

PointHunters_McClung

2026 Hampton Roads Tri-Level Weeknight · Hampton Roads Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs WaltersWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdriana Weatherly / Jennifer Turkel vs Sutherlyn Brinn / Christina Bartholomew2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMeagan Graham / Allison Lavigne vs Shielito Riodique / Janice Sabio7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSue Collins / Indu Prasadh vs Marie Nave / Sharleen Tung3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-22vs WaltersLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdriana Weatherly / Jennifer Harris vs Claire Walters / Yuli Reams1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Wadsworth / Sabra Mullis vs Erica Sartwell / Chelsea Jennings1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Grace Seneris / Indu Prasadh vs Marie Nave / Sharleen Tung6-3, 6-1
2026-08-06vs WaltersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Harris / Meagan Graham vs Sutherlyn Brinn / Karen van Daniker0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAngelica Suciu / Sabra Mullis vs Erica Sartwell / Chelsea Jennings2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Grace Seneris / Patricia Gomez vs Sharleen Tung / Somer Dimaya3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Hampton Roads Tri-Level Weeknight 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walters103009
2PointHunters_McClung0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Adriana Weatherly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Meagan Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Sue Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Heather Wadsworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Angelica Suciu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Allison Lavigne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Sabra Mullis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Mary Grace Seneris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Indu Prasadh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Mariel McClung
published
2.52
Patricia Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Turkel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adriana Weatherly
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Meagan Graham
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Sue Collins
29W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.27
3.5
Heather Wadsworth
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Angelica Suciu
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Allison Lavigne
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Sabra Mullis
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Mary Grace Seneris
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Indu Prasadh
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Mariel McClung
8W–18L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Patricia Gomez
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Jennifer Turkel
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.