Teams

BETC-Hoang

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20vs TCSP-Seattle Aces-GuntherWon 30
W#1 DoublesNelson Phan / Hwi Kim vs James Gunther / Tom Parrish6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesClarke Straus vs Daniel Nickel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLen Henzke / Kevin Vu vs Jared Leising / Jeffrey Haessler6-0, 6-1
2022-03-13vs CP-Wie Remember-KatzWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnh Tuan Hoang / Rocky Gutierrez vs Fred Wurden / Scott Mullet2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesClarke Straus vs Richard May2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHwi Kim / Kevin Vu vs Madhur Joshi / Xiadong Gong6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJosh Schneider / Nathan Tran vs Nicolas Behr / Erik Gunvaldson6-4, 7-5
2022-03-04vs HBSQ-Guzzling Squirrels-RobeyWon 40
W#1 DoublesLen Henzke / Josh Schneider vs Winston Liu / Vu To6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClarke Straus vs Lynwood Montgomery6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Porter / Rocky Gutierrez vs Paul Reni / Scott Combs6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnh Tuan Hoang / Nathan Tran vs Don Robey / Michael Liner6-1, 6-4
2022-02-26vs EDG-HiraiWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnh Tuan Hoang / Nelson Phan vs Jim Tjelle / Jerry Rey Chai6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesClarke Straus vs Brad Lee6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrian Porter / Rocky Gutierrez vs Hui Yang / James Wann6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLen Henzke / Josh Schneider vs Brian Namba / Barry Nishimura6-2, 7-5
2022-01-30vs MI-Goodman 4.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnh Tuan Hoang / Brian Porter vs Grant Pomering / Vaclav Petricek6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesClarke Straus vs Christopher Loiselle7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJosh Schneider / Kevin Vu vs Grover Holtzclaw / Sean Kelly4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-23vs BAIN-FergusonWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Porter / Rocky Gutierrez vs Roan Blacker / Brendan Peters6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJosh Schneider vs Nick Bicknell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnh Tuan Hoang / Nathan Tran vs Tom Crowley / James Ferguson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLen Henzke / Kevin Vu vs Steven Curtis / John Walker6-1, 6-2
2022-01-14vs STC-Sheppard/JohnsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnh Tuan Hoang / Ngon Phan vs Stephen Rosen / Chris Scalzo6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesClarke Straus vs Len Jordan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Porter / Rocky Gutierrez vs Allan Johnson / Andrew Osborne6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJosh Schneider / Len Henzke vs Ronald Mulberg / Jeff Roe2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-08vs CAC/SL-Vamos! BetancourtSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnh Tuan Hoang / Ngon Phan vs Bob Strickland / Phu Ngo6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClarke Straus vs Steven Nguyen6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Porter / Hung Nguyen vs Steve Kwak / James Xu5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRocky Gutierrez / Josh Schneider vs Victor Betancourt / Lohit Verma4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Ngon Phan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Clarke Straus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Len Henzke
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Nelson Phan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Rocky Gutierrez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Anh Tuan Hoang
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.70
Kevin Vu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Brian Porter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.12
Hung Nguyen
published 3.5
Josh Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nelson Phan + Ngon Phan6066% games+10.8% vs expected
Kevin Vu + Len Henzke14559% games+7.1% vs expected
Brian Porter + Ngon Phan17364% games+6.2% vs expected
Anh Tuan Hoang + Ngon Phan6159% games+4.0% vs expected
Josh Schneider + Len Henzke9259% games+3.5% vs expected
Nelson Phan + Anh Tuan Hoang8260% games+2.3% vs expected
Rocky Gutierrez + Brian Porter11953% games−4.2% vs expected
Kevin Vu + Anh Tuan Hoang3254% games−6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ngon Phan
75W–16L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Clarke Straus
34W–13L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Len Henzke
46W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Nelson Phan
75W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Rocky Gutierrez
28W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Anh Tuan Hoang
76W–40L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Kevin Vu
57W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Brian Porter
72W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Hung Nguyen
12W–34L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Josh Schneider
22W–6L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.