Teams

Bray/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Men 18 & over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-17vs Raymond/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Heimann / Glenn Neilson vs Zach Bush / Kyle Wood6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Bratton / William Winstead vs Phillip Kirlin / Jeffrey Hickman6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEthan Livingston / Curtis Higgins vs Eric Raymond / Jose Romero6-7, 2-6
2026-05-07vs Hankins/MemphisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJohn Manshack / William Winstead vs Matt Moss / John Hammons6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGlenn Neilson / Matthew Davidoff vs David Hopkins / Sean Henneberger7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRyan Coopwood vs DENIS BRUNOTTE6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCurtis Higgins / Robert O'Bryan vs Blake Hankins / Ryan McDurmon6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Collins/MemphisWon 31
L#1 DoublesEthan Livingston / Curtis Higgins vs Saunders Lin / Allen Bobango2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Coopwood vs Brantley Davidson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Winstead / John Lancaster vs Drew Hursey / David Hill6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert O'Bryan / Dayou Yu vs Colt Von Lanken / Daniel Wynn7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
William Winstead
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
John Manshack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Steve Denegri
published
3.04
John Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Ryan Coopwood
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.94
Robert O'Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Glenn Neilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Adam Bratton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Christopher Heimann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brad Swanson
published 3
Ethan Livingston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Curtis Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
David Bray
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Manshack + William Winstead7169% games−0.7% vs expected
Adam Bratton + William Winstead7162% gamesnot enough data
John Lancaster + William Winstead404 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Heimann + Glenn Neilson314 matchesnot enough data
John Manshack + Ryan Coopwood303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Winstead
65W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.13
John Manshack
68W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
Steve Denegri
17W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
John Lancaster
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Ryan Coopwood
40W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.00
Robert O'Bryan
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Glenn Neilson
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Adam Bratton
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Christopher Heimann
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Brad Swanson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Ethan Livingston
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Curtis Higgins
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
David Bray
21W–13L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.