Teams

Viera Regional Park - Newell

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.73 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-11vs EFSC - SimmonsLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie ODonnell / Kaitlin Stahl vs Jennifer Thessen / Stephanie Tran3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNaomi Coleman / Nicole Bertran vs Gaylyn Woodruff / Jessica Shinn3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Dahl / Edie Newell vs Kelly Sabel / Cynthia Simmons7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-10vs Suntree - PassmoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesLicci Barham / Nicole Bertran vs Amira Tolles / SARA BRESETTE3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Sandy Dahl vs Amy Seitz / Marijane Forde2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie ODonnell / Dana Saunders vs Ann Passmore / Sandra Rowe6-3, 6-4
2026-07-27vs RCCB - RosenquistWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaegan Hulscher / Amy McIntosh vs Lee Harrington / Jennifer Ledene6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCheri McLachlan / Edie Newell vs Melissa Rosenquist / Terry Taylor6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLicci Barham / Sandy Dahl vs Jennifer Oglesby / Heather Schleicher6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Maegan Hulscher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Stephanie ODonnell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Taylor Lutian
published 4
3.64
Licci Barham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Cheri McLachlan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Naomi Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Cuc Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Edie Newell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Nicole Bertran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Sandy Dahl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Kaitlin Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy McIntosh
published 3.5
3.18
Dana Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maegan Hulscher + Stephanie ODonnell7461% games+5.5% vs expected
Licci Barham + Naomi Coleman221454% games+2.0% vs expected
Naomi Coleman + Sandy Dahl9652% games+2.0% vs expected
Nicole Bertran + Edie Newell5354% games−1.9% vs expected
Naomi Coleman + Stephanie ODonnell5945% games−3.7% vs expected
Sandy Dahl + Kaitlin Stahl5253% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Dahl + Edie Newell2446% gamesnot enough data
Licci Barham + Sandy Dahl224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maegan Hulscher
139W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Stephanie ODonnell
50W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Taylor Lutian
26W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Licci Barham
130W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cheri McLachlan
158W–138L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Naomi Coleman
169W–144L career · 1 line in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cuc Nguyen
110W–58L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Edie Newell
160W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Nicole Bertran
65W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Sandy Dahl
209W–133L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Kaitlin Stahl
71W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy McIntosh
14W–12L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Dana Saunders
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.