Teams

WCCP-Spokane

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-21vs EW-HRSC-DeyLost 13
L#1 DoublesCathy Crowson / Karen Mathews vs Melissa McDowell / Aspen McKenna1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesValerie Rubright vs Christina Cork2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Cremers / Lori Nicol vs Courtenay Dey / Michele Dearing3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Hagen / April Denike vs Kate Huttemann / Allison Crisp1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-20vs PC-Rose/StephenLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndi Hart / Lisa Hagen vs Jill Bishop / Jill Stephens5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Crowson / Karen Mathews vs Annette Rose / Karen Madsen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLori Nicol / Laura Cremers vs Amy Nguyen / Maria Uy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-20vs WRAC-Wrac up The WinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesApril Denike / Carole Trefts vs Karen Wasylyshyn / Patricia Houghton3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Cremers / Cathy Crowson vs Kami Shaw / Anne Papik6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesValerie Rubright / Karen Mathews vs Julie Meyer / Victoria van Zile5-7, 4-6
2023-05-19vs CBRC-WhiteLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Crowson / Karen Mathews vs Judy Knox / Rise Hawley3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Hagen / Andi Hart vs Val Otto / Signe White6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarole Trefts / Lori Nicol vs Leslie Inman / Marjorie Petersen6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-05-19vs CBRC-McAteerLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Cremers / Lisa Hagen vs Kathleen McAteer / Carrie Perry6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValerie Rubright / Andi Hart vs Rathini Woodworth / Michelle Glenn3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesApril Denike / Carole Trefts vs Lisa Chapman / Renee Brockman6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Laura Cremers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Cathy Crowson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Andi Hart
published 4
Carole Trefts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Karen Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Valerie Rubright
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Tracie Kuka
published
3.63
Jacquelyn Jaech
usually #1 Singles 92%, also #1 Doubles 8% · published
3.58
April Denike
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Lisa Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lori Nicol
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Crowson + Tracie Kuka6356% games+7.3% vs expected
Lori Nicol + Carole Trefts4554% games+2.2% vs expected
Laura Cremers + Tracie Kuka5747% games−5.4% vs expected
April Denike + Carole Trefts2349% games−6.0% vs expected
Cathy Crowson + Karen Mathews6849% games−7.6% vs expected
Lisa Hagen + Andi Hart4445% games−18.1% vs expected
Lisa Hagen + Laura Cremers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Cremers
45W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Cathy Crowson
25W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Andi Hart
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Carole Trefts
7W–14L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Karen Mathews
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie Rubright
25W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Tracie Kuka
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Jacquelyn Jaech
29W–40L career · 12 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
April Denike
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Lisa Hagen
12W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Nicol
28W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.