Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wed AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-08vs Lahey/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelinda Doty / Ann Marie Dixon vs Chantel Wujtow / Hollie Williams7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLara Tracy / Nancy Preston vs Kim Justice / Marina Messier5-7, 2-6
2026-07-01vs Th PM - Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesBotum Chhay / Maura Fitzgerald vs Jennifer Knight / Brenda Eckhart3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLara Tracy / Nancy Preston vs Kaelin Cramer / Traci Gilbert-Stafford2-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs Walker/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLoralie Liggett / Maura Fitzgerald vs Wendy Mangialardi / Michelle Hamman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThalia Kahl / Brenda Maddaleni vs Jessica Lester / Cynthia Walker4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLara Tracy / Alicia Herrera vs Patricia Powers / Anne Smith6-3, 7-5
2026-06-17vs George/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelinda Doty / Loralie Liggett vs Elizabeth Davis / Celia Turner4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Preston / Karie Duke vs Kelli Haywood / Nikki Turitto1-6, 1-6
2026-06-10vs Th PM - Blevins/Thomas/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesBotum Chhay / Maura Fitzgerald vs Cari Blevins / Rachel Fogarty3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlicia Herrera / Anna Quick vs Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy / Cindy Lee1-6, 1-6
2026-06-05vs Cox/Webb/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesCathy Blankenship / Alicia Herrera vs Cristin Webb / Cindy Lee3-6, 4-6
2026-06-03vs Lahey/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesLoralie Liggett / Ann Marie Dixon vs Sandra Elliott / Hollie Williams6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wed AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Botum Chhay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Ann Marie Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brenda Ossman
published 4
3.71
Loralie Liggett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Melinda Doty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.66
Maura Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Lara Tracy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Poonam Kabaria
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Thalia Kahl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Lily Qu
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.36
Jacqueline King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Brenda Maddaleni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Karie Duke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Nancy Preston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Quick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Alicia Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Botum Chhay + Maura Fitzgerald5260% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Botum Chhay
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Ann Marie Dixon
22W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Loralie Liggett
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Melinda Doty
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
Maura Fitzgerald
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Lara Tracy
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Poonam Kabaria
26W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Thalia Kahl
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Lily Qu
18W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jacqueline King
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Brenda Maddaleni
18W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Karie Duke
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
Nancy Preston
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
3
Anna Quick
62W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Alicia Herrera
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.