Teams

BBTC-MATTHEWS 3.5 W

2026 Adult 18 & Over - GC · Women 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-23vs Blevins TOCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeAnn Davis / Brianna Beesley vs Mary Brumley / Kimberly Adams0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTrisa Clark vs Jennifer Maisano1-6, 0-6
2026-04-21vs OSTC - VoWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeAnn Davis / Mary-Katherine Barnes vs Pam McElhany / Julia Weaver6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTrisa Clark vs Angela Vo0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesBrianna Beesley vs Melissa Rumsey6-4, 7-6
2026-04-09vs BBTC - AllenLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary-Katherine Barnes / Taylor Leatherwood vs Linda Benigno / Jennifer Ellzey6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Mitterer / Rebecca Powers vs Kathleen Mayer / Stacey Rishel5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeAnn Davis / Trisa Clark vs Kathi Nelms / Jaime Denmark2-6, 5-7
2026-03-05vs BBTC - FitzgeraldLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobin Mitterer / LeAnn Davis vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall / Lauren Patin0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBrianna Beesley vs Linda Creel6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMary-Katherine Barnes / Taylor Leatherwood vs Amber Juraszek / Jennifer Stewart5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTrisa Clark / Rebecca Powers vs Kathleen Fitzgerald / Wendy Ray1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Allen42201021209
2TOCC Wrigley 3.5 18s1371328186
3BBTC-MATTHEWS 3.5 W0441633222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Mary-Katherine Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
LeAnn Davis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Brianna Beesley
usually #1 Doubles 20%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.97
Taylor Leatherwood
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Robin Mitterer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Trisa Clark
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Leatherwood + Brianna Beesley6158% games+13.5% vs expected
Brianna Beesley + LeAnn Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary-Katherine Barnes
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
LeAnn Davis
36W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17
3
Brianna Beesley
53W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Taylor Leatherwood
22W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Robin Mitterer
7W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Trisa Clark
2W–42L career · 9 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.