Teams

Tarpon Cove - Schultz

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Case / Nancy Schultz vs Dawn Amato / Lisa Campbell4-6, 5-7
2023-03-01vs Naples Lakes - PrendergastSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLynda Giannetta / Sharon Case vs Patricia Wacker / Kelly Deufel6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Sherry Burns vs Vicki Prendergast / Sharon Davis6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-23vs Village Walk Bonita - LaggisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Satariano / Nancy Schultz vs Ann Kremer / Margaret Laggis3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSharon Case / Sherry Lambert vs Janet Martin / Vicki MacE3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-19vs Players Club - ShelineLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetty Sayad / Nancy Schultz vs Michelle Kraft / Coleen Mohler5-7, 6-7
2023-02-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Schultz / Christine Satariano vs Cheryl Ingram / Heidi Nettler1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Case / Deirdre Klenkel vs Kathryn North / Diane Young6-2, 6-2
2023-01-26vs Naples Beach Hotel - EddySplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Schultz / Rebecca Meath vs Carola Heinrich / Susan Magno3-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Case / Deirdre Klenkel vs Amy Schiffer / Barbara Frank7-5, 7-5
2023-01-19vs Valencia Bonita - GredingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Christine Satariano vs Sue Capps / Kate Gredinger6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Schultz / Christine Satariano vs Christiane Gauthier / Anna Lis4-6, 6-7
2023-01-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Case / Rebecca Meath vs Ilene Flack / Brenda Smith4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Christine Satariano
published 3.5
3.34
Betty Sayad
published 3.5
Lynda Giannetta
published
Nancy Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Rebecca Meath
published
Sharon Case
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Case + Nancy Schultz2349% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Schultz + Betty Sayad224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Satariano
37W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
Betty Sayad
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Lynda Giannetta
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Schultz
46W–57L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Meath
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Case
32W–26L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.