Teams

Jones/Calhoun

2025 · 2026 EVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-01-04vs Locke/CalhounLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelm / Sandra Copeland vs Madison Erwin / April Charles1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Mobbs vs Mollie Locke2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-12-23vs EVTA/Lori PatchLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Dobash / Gina Rawls vs Camille Abney / Constance Fallin0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Mobbs vs April Chastain4-6, 2-6
2025-12-20vs Locke/CalhounWon 20
W#1 DoublesGina Rawls / Pam Chapman vs Savannah Weeks / Jennifer Massey6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Mobbs vs Cassey LeBouef6-1, 6-2
2025-12-11vs EVTA/Lori PatchWon 21
L#1 DoublesGina Rawls / Sandra Copeland vs April Chastain / Lori Patch1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAnna George vs Constance Fallin6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanelle Williams / Emily Mobbs vs Amy Hodges / Elizabeth Brumbelow6-4, 7-6
2025-11-20vs EVTA/Lori PatchLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Kelm / Anna George vs Constance Fallin / Camille Abney6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPam Chapman / Jessica Dobash vs Amy Hodges / Tiffany Howerton6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-18vs Locke/CalhounSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnna George / Janelle Williams vs Pam Abernathy / Cassey LeBouef6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGina Rawls / Jessica Dobash vs Katie Moraitakis / Savannah Weeks6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 EVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Tina Jones
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Pam Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Anna George
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.55
Emily Mobbs
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.40
Elizabeth Kelm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Sandra Copeland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Gina Rawls
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.95
Jessica Dobash
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Chapman + Emily Mobbs4162% games+9.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Jones
22W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Pam Chapman
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anna George
9W–3L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
2.5
Emily Mobbs
14W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.55
Elizabeth Kelm
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Sandra Copeland
9W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Gina Rawls
4W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Jessica Dobash
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.