Teams

Chant/Chase-Aguzzi/Murfreesboro

2023 Adult 40 & Over - Murfreesboro · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Kathleen Carbonari
published
3.75
Janet Adamson
published
3.73
Cindy Mccullough
published 4
3.71
Cindy Puckett
published 4
3.70
Kelly Horna
published
3.66
Crystal Wray
published 4
3.63
Karen Corn
published
3.59
Janet Prentice
published
3.57
Midori Egawa
published
3.56
Jan Phanthalangsy
published
3.48
Tydres Mestiri
published
3.43
Shannon Fox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mccullough + Kathleen Carbonari33563% games+5.0% vs expected
Crystal Wray + Tydres Mestiri3545% games+0.7% vs expected
Shannon Fox + Jan Phanthalangsy224 matchesnot enough data
Jan Phanthalangsy + Janet Prentice123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Janet Adamson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Carbonari
89W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
4.08
Janet Adamson
44W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cindy Mccullough
56W–37L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cindy Puckett
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Kelly Horna
23W–23L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Crystal Wray
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Karen Corn
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
Janet Prentice
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Midori Egawa
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jan Phanthalangsy
24W–32L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Tydres Mestiri
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
36W–21L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
Shannon Fox
47W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Shannon Johnson Waxman
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.