Teams

PTC-Johnson/Fruits

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nina Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Seth Yount
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Christie Herkert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Maya Mori
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Paul Preston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Hilary Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Paul Best
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.85
David Prescott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Dave Sasaki
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results7 ties
2021-11-13Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChristie Herkert / Michael McTague vs Jane King Ayers / Eric Ayers6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Paul Preston vs Lupine Swanson / Zack Hegge6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHilary Johnson / Dave Sasaki vs Jing Li / Yongping Liu6-4, 7-5
2021-10-31Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNina Hanson / David Prescott vs Robert Gettle / Patricia Eargle6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristie Herkert / Dave Sasaki vs Jennifer Drew / Stephen Drew6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMolly Albright / Michael McTague vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-23Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMaya Mori / Seth Yount vs Eddie Shin / Kim Tellin6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMeegan Fruits / David Prescott vs Jill Boyce / Colin Looi6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMolly Albright / Paul Best vs Constance Erickson / Sheldon Sun6-1, 6-1
2021-10-09Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHilary Johnson / David Prescott vs Matt Savage / Allie Mauck6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaya Mori / Seth Yount vs Kenny Wong / Christina Bergstrom6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNina Hanson / Dave Sasaki vs Mark Bernazzani / Becky Nelson7-5, 6-3
2021-10-02Won 30
W#1 DoublesChristie Herkert / Seth Yount vs Kourtnie Katayama / Adam DiCarlo6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHilary Johnson / Paul Best vs Mikayla Posey / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMolly Albright / Michael McTague vs Angela Diaz de Leon / Arturo Barroso6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2021-09-26Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristie Herkert / Paul Best vs JIN PARK / Jinmi Kemple6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Paul Preston vs Misug Kim / Daniel M Kim6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNina Hanson / Michael McTague vs Hyekyeong Kim / Jason Lee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-09-19Won 30
W#1 DoublesNina Hanson / Seth Yount vs Adrienne Dedelow / Brian Parker6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHilary Johnson / David Prescott vs Grayson Dempsey / Jack Dempsey6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaya Mori / Dave Sasaki vs Kay Hallmark / Gary Hallmark7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nina Hanson
110W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.69
4
Seth Yount
178W–58L career
13%87%0%
3.59
3.5
Christie Herkert
30W–31L career
not enough data
3.5
Maya Mori
86W–77L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3
Paul Preston
31W–41L career
0%76%24%
3.00
3
Hilary Johnson
68W–64L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86
3
David Prescott
44W–47L career
1%91%8%
2.85
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60
3
Dave Sasaki
21W–42L career
15%85%0%
2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.