Teams

Garrett/Fayetteville/SRC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-22vs Barkley/Bentonville/MRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesVoja Radosavljevic / Tihomir Buncic vs Cooper Barkley / Joshua Ammons2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesEnrique Tudela vs Derrick Johnson6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTrenton Miller vs AJ Smith7-6, 6-4
2025-03-15vs Lasater/Rogers/SVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesEnrique Tudela vs MICHAEL KLEYDMAN6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSpencer Scarbrough / Tihomir Buncic vs Reid Osborn / Max Bachman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-22vs Nayani/Fayetteville/SRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTihomir Buncic / John Gottbrath vs Luke Lundstrum / William Blake4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEnrique Tudela vs Samuel Musser6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTrenton Miller vs Azarudeen Jahir Hussain1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tihomir Buncic
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Vincent Xavier
published
3.49
SANDEEP KANAMALA
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.47
Voja Radosavljevic
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Mitchell Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Andy Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
John Gottbrath
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
Bradley Garrett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Spencer Scarbrough
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Jeff Gabbard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Enrique Tudela
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jake Ladue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Trenton Miller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tihomir Buncic
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Vincent Xavier
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
SANDEEP KANAMALA
25W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Voja Radosavljevic
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Mitchell Johnson
10W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Andy Watkins
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
John Gottbrath
4W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Bradley Garrett
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Spencer Scarbrough
8W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Jeff Gabbard
17W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Enrique Tudela
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jake Ladue
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trenton Miller
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.