Teams

Norman, Phyllis

2023 Adult 18 & Over Daytime League 2.5W - 5.0 · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-16vs Jody HolsingerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Burgdorfer / Carolyn Gilmore vs Meg Townsend / Stacey Moore6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSara Maguire / Jessi Reed vs Susan Doerr / Tracy Lockton6-7, 4-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTiffany Blackwell / Bridget Throm vs Robin Foderberg / Renee Steffes6-3, 6-3
2022-11-11vs Thompson, LisaWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Blackwell / Sara Maguire vs Katy Gondring / Stephanie Tapia-Gonzales6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Root / Emily Fike vs Jennifer VanMeter / Kelli Valdez3-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Foster / Margaret Pugh vs Lyla Flohrs / Theresa Montgomery6-4, 6-0
2022-11-04vs Bruner, KatherineWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Foster / Sara Maguire vs Amy Hart / Sarah Ross6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusie Keefer / Emily Fike vs Katherine Bruner / Laura Chisholm4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Conley / Dawn Vitha vs Shanna Loyd / Allison Waters6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2022-10-28vs Menghini, JessicaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Burgdorfer / Susie Keefer vs Lori Ambroske / Linda Shinn6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Maguire / Jessi Reed vs Karina Hoffmann / Susan Hoffman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Root / Keri Mooers vs Katie Trenkle / Angie Mcdermed6-1, 6-3
2022-10-07vs Wedel, NancyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessi Reed / Tiffany Blackwell vs Lori Breshears / Melodi Calvert6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBridget Throm / Melissa Foster vs Vanessa Watkins / Susan Mayer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Conley / Emily Fike vs Maki True / Tasha Evatt4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Jill Burgdorfer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.13
Phyllis Norman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.12
Sara Maguire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Mary Sandefur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Margaret Pugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Tiffany Blackwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Bridget Throm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Carolyn Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Keri Mooers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Emily Fike
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Jessi Reed
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Susie Keefer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Heather Conley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Dawn Vitha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Andrea Root
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Melissa Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Keefer + Jill Burgdorfer10557% games+7.8% vs expected
Sara Maguire + Jessi Reed602559% games+6.7% vs expected
Keri Mooers + Dawn Vitha383551% games+4.5% vs expected
Phyllis Norman + Sara Maguire8258% games−0.6% vs expected
Margaret Pugh + Mary Sandefur9753% games−1.3% vs expected
Heather Conley + Tiffany Blackwell3253% gamesnot enough data
Susie Keefer + Bridget Throm134 matchesnot enough data
Bridget Throm + Melissa Foster314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Burgdorfer
158W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.42
Phyllis Norman
211W–58L career · 7 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
4.13
Sara Maguire
124W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.12
Mary Sandefur
90W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Margaret Pugh
46W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Tiffany Blackwell
66W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Bridget Throm
90W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Carolyn Gilmore
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Keri Mooers
99W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Emily Fike
12W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Jessi Reed
99W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.60
Susie Keefer
97W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Heather Conley
36W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Dawn Vitha
150W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Andrea Root
93W–120L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Jourdan Mercurio-Lewis
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Foster
28W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.