Teams

SDNC 4.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC (3:2)/ Lin

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 DoublesIsabelle Guy / Catherine Pla vs Tracy Russo / Rosemary Mireles1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Pla / Carol Jensen vs Lori Merino / Lisa Sherwood4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Kelter / Anne Reese vs Christina Cortes / Harriet Isaac7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-09vs SDNC 4.0 RBCTC (2:3)/ FisherLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Kelter / Sarah Devereaux vs Sheri Ortiz / Laura Pettit1-6, 1-6
2023-05-26vs SDNC 4.0 Surf & Turf (2:3)/ MosesLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Devereaux / Lindsay Cook vs Angela Hart / Deborah Fitzgerald3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Tumini / Carol Jensen vs Dana Moskowitz / Jessica Mills3-6, 3-6
2023-05-12vs SDNC 4.0 La Costa (3:2)/ PotterWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Pla / Sarah Reeves vs Rebecca Fletcher / Lynne Nero2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLindsay Cook / Sarah Devereaux vs Jennifer Bjornstad / Michele Andrew2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-14vs SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run (3:2)/ SwartzLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnne Reese / Sarah Devereaux vs Holly Miller / Meredith Priestley6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRuth Tumini / Lisa Michaels vs Julie Swartz / Monica Berenter2-6, 6-7
2023-04-07vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC (2:3)/ GarrisonWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Pla / Carol Jensen vs Helen Greis / Nelda Swanson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Lindsay Cook
published
3.98
Sarah Devereaux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Julia Winter
published 4
Carey Cimino
published 4
Isabelle Guy
published 4
3.65
Anne Reese
published 4
3.61
Catherine Pla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Kay Lin
published
3.55
Janet Hoover
published
3.50
Colleen Roth
published 4
3.41
Ann Kelter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Ruth Tumini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Lisa Michaels
published
3.12
Jessica Krems
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Lin + Janet Hoover1643% games+1.2% vs expected
Kay Lin + Ruth Tumini2436% games−10.4% vs expected
Kay Lin + Julia Winter224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Kelter + Sarah Devereaux224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Kelter + Anne Reese404 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Pla + Ann Kelter213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Devereaux + Lindsay Cook033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Cook
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Sarah Devereaux
23W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Julia Winter
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Carey Cimino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Isabelle Guy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Anne Reese
30W–46L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Catherine Pla
40W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kay Lin
8W–23L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Janet Hoover
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Colleen Roth
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.50
3.5
Ann Kelter
86W–101L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.41
4
Ruth Tumini
47W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
Lisa Michaels
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Jessica Krems
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.