Teams

Lindekugel - Cascades

2025 NETX Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-13vs Berry - LeTourneau UniversityLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Jackson / Kimberly Park vs Sushama Brimmer / Christine Kjosa6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGlenda Lindekugel / Jackie Jones vs Cheryl Upchurch / Tricia Courtright6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelanie Winans / Karla Jester vs Tami Bitting / Debra Richardson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-06vs Berry - LeTourneau UniversityWon 30
W#1 DoublesShawna Tankersley / Melanie Winans vs Cheryl Upchurch / Debra Richardson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeggy Smith / Andrea Booth vs Christine Kjosa / Indira Lanka6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelly Hodge / Beth Short vs Nancy Fasang / Tricia Courtright6-2, 6-1
2025-03-16vs Berry - LeTourneau UniversityWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Booth / Anne Hembree vs Nancy Fasang / Tricia Courtright6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDebbie Jackson / Kimberly Park vs Debra Richardson / Tami Bitting6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJackie Jones / Kristin Werner vs Becky Berry / Indira Lanka6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Andrea Booth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.61
Beth Short
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Melanie Winans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Kelly Hodge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Glenda Lindekugel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Shawna Tankersley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Debbie Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Anne Hembree
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jackie Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karla Jester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Werner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Booth
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.51
4
Beth Short
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Melanie Winans
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Kelly Hodge
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Glenda Lindekugel
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Shawna Tankersley
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
4
Debbie Jackson
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
3.5
Anne Hembree
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Jones
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karla Jester
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Werner
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Smith
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.