Teams

PC-Backhandlers

2022 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-30vs WRAC-A-TEARSLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoman Gavino / Lorena Mayuga vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Brad Bartol1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatty Aoyama / Vincent Beasley vs Kelley Quinn / Michael Bendtsen4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEvoria Beasley / Bart Munson vs Maureen Woodward / Kent Ozkardesh3-6, 3-6
2022-07-29Won 30
W#1 DoublesPatty Aoyama / Vincent Beasley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMoe Davari / Evoria Beasley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Koehler / Craig Hansen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-29vs PC-Doubles or NothingLost 03
L#1 DoublesRoman Gavino / Lorena Mayuga vs Erica Clontz / Jeremey White1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMoe Davari / Evoria Beasley vs Sarah Brooks / Cory Brooks0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Hansen / Theresa Koehler vs Brando Suarez / Danielle Dunigan6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WRAC-A-TEARS3090239
2PC-Happy Hour3193991
3PC-All About That Ace!3184989
4PC-Doubles or Nothing2163655
5PC-Backhandlers12361275
6YTC-Ballers030918108
7SRC-Inland Northwest0411123143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Vincent Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Evoria Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Roman Gavino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Craig Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Bart Munson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Theresa Koehler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Patty Aoyama
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lorena Mayuga
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Moe Davari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Aoyama + Roman Gavino6165% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Koehler + Craig Hansen1445% gamesnot enough data
Bart Munson + Evoria Beasley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vincent Beasley
48W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Evoria Beasley
14W–19L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Roman Gavino
80W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Craig Hansen
28W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Bart Munson
19W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Theresa Koehler
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Patty Aoyama
34W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
2.52
Lorena Mayuga
4W–17L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Moe Davari
21W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.