Teams

Yadkin/Boone/40+6.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 40 & Over · Women 6.5 - Friday Mornings

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 11 9:30 AM
Tanglewood Community Tennis Center
Sep 18 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Meghan BooneAmanda Tanner
Sep 22 9:30 AM
Katie Thompson
Sep 25 9:30 AM
Tanglewood Community Tennis Center
Oct 2 9:30 AM
Old Town Club Inc.
Oct 6 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Meghan BooneAmanda Tanner
Oct 9 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Meghan BooneAmanda Tanner
2026-08-21vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40+3.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Tanner / Ella Hammond vs Betsy Harris / Gaines Douglas2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Boone / Jennifer Jones vs Sarah Dalena / Katie Thompson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNadia Clevenger / Sarah Lycan vs Laura Harvey / Natalie Jennings2-6
2026-08-14vs Yadkin/FCC/40+6.5 TeamLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeghan Boone / Sarah Lycan vs Araya Puwanant / Laura Greene2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNadia Clevenger / DELISSE METCALF vs Kristen Mason / Carol Parker2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 6.5 - Friday Mornings
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Thompson/OT/40+3.5000000
2Yadkin/FCC/40+6.5 Team000000
3Yadkin/Boone/40+6.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Ella Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Amanda Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Sarah Lycan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Meghan Boone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Parissa Ballard
published
2.63
Nadia Clevenger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
DELISSE METCALF
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Grace Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Boone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Boone + Amanda Tanner5160% games+9.4% vs expected
Nadia Clevenger + Sarah Lycan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ella Hammond
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Amanda Tanner
9W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Sarah Lycan
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.06
Meghan Boone
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Parissa Ballard
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Nadia Clevenger
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
DELISSE METCALF
0W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Grace Anderson
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Jeanne Boone
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.