Teams

IA-REG-Avilez-40&Over7.0MXD

40 & Over Mixed Sectionals- Sept 23-25th · 7.0 MXD

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA-REG-Avilez-40&Over7.0MXD000000
2KS-REG-Jargo/Ball/40&Over7.0MXD000000
3MO-Reg-Kim/40&Over7.0MXD000000
4NE-REG-Hewett/Alati000000
5OK-Reg-Baldwin/Pappas000000
6STL-REG-Albrecht/40&Over7.0MXD000000
7KSWC-Reg-Seitz/40&Over7.0MXD000000
8NEWC- REG- Strawhecker000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Amanda Hilton
published 4
3.73
Matthew Whipps
published
3.65
Cristen Schipper
published 4
3.48
Todd Versteeg
published
3.33
Ruben Avilez
published
3.31
Nick Stahly
published
Ann Stahly
published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Hough
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Hough + Todd Versteeg4151% gamesnot enough data
Nick Stahly + Ann Stahly224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Hilton
60W–26L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Matthew Whipps
63W–57L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cristen Schipper
69W–30L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Todd Versteeg
40W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
Ruben Avilez
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Nick Stahly
47W–43L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ann Stahly
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Hough
30W–14L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.