Teams

Serving You

2024 Prince Georges Combo Mixed · Prince Georges Combo Mixed 5.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-26vs Acers & LAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Wiseman / Jerrise Spencer vs Henry Jenkins / Tianna Jenkins6-1, 6-2
2024-10-19vs Acers & LAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Wiseman / Donna Pearson vs Issac Mance / Cortney Mukushi6-3, 6-2
2024-10-13vs Acers & LAWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Wiseman / Jerrise Spencer vs Karen Casey / Issac Mance6-3, 7-5
2024-10-12vs Acers & LAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Wiseman / Linda Clowe vs Raymond Lyons / Ayanna Charles6-3, 6-1
2024-09-15vs Acers & LALost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Stanley / Jerrise Spencer vs Dennis DuPree / Wendy Wasserman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-14vs Acers & LAWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Wiseman / Donna Pearson vs Issac Mance / Wendy Wasserman6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Combo Mixed 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Mark Holt
published
2.83
Jim Wiseman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Jerrise Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Waldo Ford
published
2.79
Deana Stamper
published 3
2.79
Natalie Walker
published
2.79
Chet Thompson
published 3
2.66
Deborah Crite
published 3
2.65
Donna Pearson
published
2.59
Brian Stanley
published 3
2.55
Beverly Taylor
published 3
2.05
Kelly Garry Burks
published
Keesha Blythe
published
Linda Clowe
published
Phillip Belin
published
Stephen Siegel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Holt
3W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Jim Wiseman
26W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Jerrise Spencer
48W–46L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Waldo Ford
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Deana Stamper
69W–70L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Natalie Walker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Chet Thompson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Deborah Crite
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Donna Pearson
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%15%85%
2.65
3
Brian Stanley
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Beverly Taylor
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kelly Garry Burks
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Keesha Blythe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Clowe
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Phillip Belin
1W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Siegel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.