Teams

Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills

2022 Foothills Spring 40 & Over League · Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-05vs Horyza/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Shokes / Corinna Driscoll vs Jennifer Beane / Jennifer Graham7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-28vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDEBORAH OBERLE / Sondra Simmons vs Misha Ahern / Maile Kim4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-14vs Davis/CRCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Karen Isbell2-6, 3-6
2022-04-07vs VonAllmen/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / DEBORAH OBERLE vs Julie Wilson / Heather Davis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Saine / Carolyn Carlile vs Rhonda Kiser / Aleshia Abernathy4-6, 0-6
2022-03-24vs Horyza/LHCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDEBORAH OBERLE / Sondra Simmons vs Sandi Horyza / Kristine Hutton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Mindy Bolick5-7, 5-7
2022-03-17vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Pamela Saine vs Mitzi Arrowood / Amy Cody6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Corcoran / Carolyn Carlile vs Pam Britt / Priscilla Faucette1-6, 2-6
2022-03-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesDEBORAH OBERLE / Sondra Simmons vs Susan Davis / Beth Martin7-5, 6-3
2022-03-03vs VonAllmen/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDEBORAH OBERLE / Sondra Simmons vs Kelly Meier / Rhonda Kiser6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Kathy Collins6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Karen Shokes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Sondra Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.67
Maria Sherrill
published
2.66
Olivia Good
published
2.61
DEBORAH OBERLE
published 3
2.56
Linda Corcoran
published
2.42
Carolyn Carlile
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Rhonda Laxton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Shokes + Sondra Simmons1536% gamesnot enough data
Sondra Simmons + Carolyn Carlile2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Shokes
176W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sondra Simmons
157W–103L career · 8 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Maria Sherrill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Olivia Good
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
DEBORAH OBERLE
3W–16L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Linda Corcoran
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
2.5
Carolyn Carlile
51W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%72%28%
2.42
Rhonda Laxton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.