Teams

LLHE-Hession/Jetton Lake Ladies

2026 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-14vs LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMPLost 13
L#1 DoublesDana Goodrich / Lauren Hession vs Christine Kahm / Kate Meiners0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Gay vs Lina Clarke1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Milligan / Jordan Peters vs Madison Lohnes / Diana West3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Davis / Felicia Dean vs Andreina Morris / MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY6-2, 6-0
2026-05-08vs LJHU-Huggins/CSDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Maggie Siebert vs Janna Huggins / Maggie Lawrence6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Gay / Kathleen Milligan vs Maria Emilia de la Orden / Michelle Fontana4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Hession / Courtney Rowe vs Katelyn Goodnough / Greigh Lucas6-2, 6-4
2026-04-18vs LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMPSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLori Woods / Anna Gay vs Toni Laney / Irma Laney4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMaggie Siebert vs Hannah Chillag3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFelicia Dean / Sunny Bowers vs Andreina Morris / Kristen Oliver6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Jennings / Jordan Peters vs Amanda Patrocino / Kate Meiners7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs LJHU-Huggins/CSDLost 12
W#1 DoublesFelicia Dean / Kelly Hallman vs Janna Huggins / Maggie Lawrence4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCourtney Rowe / Dawn Jennings vs Christine Richards / Amanda Berry4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDiofra Azucenas / Kathleen Milligan vs Kim Ezzo / Maria Emilia de la Orden1-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMPLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnna Gay / Dana Goodrich vs Toni Laney / Irma Laney2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFelicia Dean / Lori Woods vs Christine Kahm / Diana West6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Hallman / Courtney Rowe vs Andreina Morris / MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY3-6, 4-6
2026-03-15vs LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMPLost 23
L#1 DoublesDana Goodrich / Kathleen Milligan vs Toni Laney / Irma Laney4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJordan Peters vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSunny Bowers / Felicia Dean vs Lina Clarke / Hannah Chillag4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDawn Jennings vs Claudia Vizzini6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Gay / Susan Davis vs Kristen Oliver / Amanda Patrocino6-2, 6-2
2026-03-14vs LJHU-Huggins/CSDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDiofra Azucenas / Kathleen Milligan vs Kim Ezzo / Maria Emilia de la Orden6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMaggie Siebert vs Jackie Gaine4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSunny Bowers / Felicia Dean vs Maggie Lawrence / Christine Richards6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLori Woods / Dawn Jennings vs Amanda Berry / Michelle Fontana7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Women 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMP71281228281
2LMLE-Lewis/Denny/NMP 18+ 4.562291126253
3LCWO-Woodruff/Jetton53221842310
4LLHE-Hession/Jetton Lake Ladies25132247341
5LJHU-Huggins/CSD25132247341
6LLTE- TERRY/NMP1793163396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Sunny Bowers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.35
Dana Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Anna Gay
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.26
Lori Woods
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.25
Diofra Azucenas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Felicia Dean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.18
Courtney Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Dawn Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Kathleen Milligan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.02
Jordan Peters
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Kelly Hallman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.81
Maggie Siebert
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Lauren Hession
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Hallman + Maggie Siebert9357% games+6.4% vs expected
Dana Goodrich + Anna Gay4159% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Rowe + Dawn Jennings213 matchesnot enough data
Sunny Bowers + Felicia Dean213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sunny Bowers
50W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Dana Goodrich
89W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Anna Gay
42W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Lori Woods
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Diofra Azucenas
99W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Felicia Dean
11W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Courtney Rowe
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Dawn Jennings
209W–84L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Kathleen Milligan
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Jordan Peters
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Maggie Siebert
94W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Lauren Hession
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.