Teams

Graybill/18s/6.5/TCC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Dawn Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Brittany Graybill
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Ciana McDaniel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.67
Celia Guillory
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Elizabeth Alario
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Emily Drake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Jane Carrey
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
Jenna Shamieh
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lauren Renwick
usually #3 Doubles 72%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Layne Neitzschman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nicole Allison
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Stephanie Nash
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celia Guillory + Stephanie Nash5449% gamesnot enough data
Brittany Graybill + Nicole Allison8076% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Alario + Jenna Shamieh2349% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Nash + Jane Carrey303 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Allison + Lauren Renwick303 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Renwick + Jenna Shamieh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Fowler
12W–7L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
3.5
Brittany Graybill
29W–10L career · 24 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Ciana McDaniel
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Celia Guillory
8W–13L career · 14 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Elizabeth Alario
9W–15L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Drake
7W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Carrey
17W–8L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenna Shamieh
17W–16L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Renwick
12W–7L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Layne Neitzschman
15W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Allison
30W–8L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Nash
28W–16L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.